III)     Inside the Edition in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

fourteen. During the light on the position explained above, it can be concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Case files could also be accessed from the public access terminals during the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed. 

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it really is unclear the way it relates to any given situation, generally rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers and also the circumstances of your case at hand. These decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being created.

The issue here is that an accused might say that they intended to injure the victim, but they didn't plan to eliminate them. In other words, they could claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.

after release from the jail he missing interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors more info V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are in the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy topic for the approval in the competent authority.

Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration by the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access to the public to solution the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence along with the separation of powers.

A decreased court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even when it feels that it is actually unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it could possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--